Coastal Carolina
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
131  Letitia Saayman JR 20:11
215  Kyla Van Graan SO 20:26
472  Aynslee Van Graan FR 20:54
2,329  Rachel Byrd FR 22:55
2,601  Emma Harrelson FR 23:16
2,662  Jackie Brengel JR 23:22
2,762  LaChelsie Thomas JR 23:31
2,836  Regina Peattie SO 23:40
3,327  Taylor Creagh FR 24:45
National Rank #80 of 341
Southeast Region Rank #10 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 86.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Letitia Saayman Kyla Van Graan Aynslee Van Graan Rachel Byrd Emma Harrelson Jackie Brengel LaChelsie Thomas Regina Peattie Taylor Creagh
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 861 20:04 20:11 20:28 22:47 23:15 22:49 23:30 24:24
Blue Ridge Open Meet 10/17 1118 20:15 21:07 21:08 23:16 23:33 23:28 23:32
Big South Conference Championships 11/01 1173 20:41 21:09 21:25 22:56 23:06 23:22 23:43 25:02
Southeast Region Championships 11/14 903 20:05 20:01 20:44 22:49 24:23 23:47 24:05
NCAA Championship 11/22 20:10 20:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.1 565 0.1 0.5 1.3 3.6 7.7 15.8 25.5 32.0 10.6 2.2 0.6 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Letitia Saayman 41.0% 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Kyla Van Graan 7.3% 130.8
Aynslee Van Graan 0.0% 155.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Letitia Saayman 15.1 0.2 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.7 2.7 3.4 4.2 4.7 5.6 4.7 5.6 4.7 5.5 4.7 4.7 4.1 3.9 3.4 3.4 2.9 2.2 2.4 2.1
Kyla Van Graan 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.5 2.9 3.2 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.8
Aynslee Van Graan 56.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Rachel Byrd 223.5
Emma Harrelson 242.8
Jackie Brengel 247.4
LaChelsie Thomas 254.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 1.3% 1.3 15
16 3.6% 3.6 16
17 7.7% 7.7 17
18 15.8% 15.8 18
19 25.5% 25.5 19
20 32.0% 32.0 20
21 10.6% 10.6 21
22 2.2% 2.2 22
23 0.6% 0.6 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0